|
There are some 65 issues resolved for 2.9.1 and 6 weeks since the 2.9.0
release. I am planning on releasing 2.9.1 in a week or so. Thoughts? -- Hadrian Zbarcea Principal Software Architect Talend, Inc http://coders.talend.com/ http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ |
|
+1
Sounds good to me Christian Am 07.02.2012 16:53, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea: > There are some 65 issues resolved for 2.9.1 and 6 weeks since the > 2.9.0 release. I am planning on releasing 2.9.1 in a week or so. > > Thoughts? -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com |
|
In reply to this post by hadrian
+1
Regards JB On 02/07/2012 04:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > There are some 65 issues resolved for 2.9.1 and 6 weeks since the 2.9.0 > release. I am planning on releasing 2.9.1 in a week or so. > > Thoughts? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [hidden email] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com |
|
In reply to this post by hadrian
Hi
Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to 2.9.1 as there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding the proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x release or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? Babak |
|
Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since
then I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention is to resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low hanging fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as well, so I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere between 80 and 100. Cheers, Hadrian On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: > Hi > > Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to 2.9.1 as > there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding the > proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. > > Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x release > or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? > > Babak > > -- > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html > Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hadrian Zbarcea Principal Software Architect Talend, Inc http://coders.talend.com/ http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ |
|
Hello Hadrian!
Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? Best, Christian On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since then > I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention is to > resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low hanging > fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. > > In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as well, so > I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere between 80 > and 100. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > > On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to 2.9.1 as >> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding the >> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >> >> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x release >> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? >> >> Babak >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.** >> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-**Release-tp5463566p5466569.html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- > Hadrian Zbarcea > Principal Software Architect > Talend, Inc > http://coders.talend.com/ > http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ > |
|
Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we
can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok last week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one failure which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway. If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout. Cheers, Hadrian [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote: > Hello Hadrian! > > Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? > > Best, > Christian > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since then >> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention is to >> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low hanging >> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. >> >> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as well, so >> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere between 80 >> and 100. >> >> Cheers, >> Hadrian >> >> >> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to 2.9.1 as >>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding the >>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >>> >>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x release >>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? >>> >>> Babak >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.** >>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-**Release-tp5463566p5466569.html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> -- >> Hadrian Zbarcea >> Principal Software Architect >> Talend, Inc >> http://coders.talend.com/ >> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >> > -- Hadrian Zbarcea Principal Software Architect Talend, Inc http://coders.talend.com/ http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ |
|
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030 would be good :)
Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be considered a fix as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its lack of proxy support. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we > can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok last > week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one failure > which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway. > > If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp > > > On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote: > >> Hello Hadrian! >> >> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? >> >> Best, >> Christian >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since >>> then >>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention is >>> to >>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low hanging >>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. >>> >>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as well, so >>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere between 80 >>> and 100. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Hadrian >>> >>> >>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>>> >>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to 2.9.1 >>>> as >>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding >>>> the >>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >>>> >>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x >>>> release >>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? >>>> >>>> Babak >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.**** >>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-****Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html< >>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-** >>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >>>> > >>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>> Principal Software Architect >>> Talend, Inc >>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >> > -- > Hadrian Zbarcea > Principal Software Architect > Talend, Inc > http://coders.talend.com/ > http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ > |
|
Thank Chris, looking into it.
Hadrian On 02/27/2012 09:56 AM, chris snow wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030 would be good :) > > Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be considered a fix > as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its lack > of proxy support. > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we >> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok last >> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one failure >> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway. >> >> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout. >> >> Cheers, >> Hadrian >> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp >> >> >> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote: >> >>> Hello Hadrian! >>> >>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? >>> >>> Best, >>> Christian >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since >>>> then >>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention is >>>> to >>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low hanging >>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. >>>> >>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as well, so >>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere between 80 >>>> and 100. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Hadrian >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to 2.9.1 >>>>> as >>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding >>>>> the >>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >>>>> >>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x >>>>> release >>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? >>>>> >>>>> Babak >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.**** >>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-****Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html< >>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-** >>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >>>>>> >>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>> Principal Software Architect >>>> Talend, Inc >>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Hadrian Zbarcea >> Principal Software Architect >> Talend, Inc >> http://coders.talend.com/ >> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >> > -- Hadrian Zbarcea Principal Software Architect Talend, Inc http://coders.talend.com/ http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ |
|
If it's considered as bug or improvement, I would like to fix [1]. It's an
issue we hit last week in our development team and have to use a ugly workaround... [1] http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DefaultUnitOfWork-doesn-t-copy-headers-from-the-original-message-if-it-s-a-JmsMessage-td5518546.html Best, Christian On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[hidden email]> wrote: > Thank Chris, looking into it. > Hadrian > > > On 02/27/2012 09:56 AM, chris snow wrote: > >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-5030<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030>would be good :) >> >> Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be considered a >> fix >> as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its >> lack >> of proxy support. >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we >>> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok >>> last >>> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one failure >>> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway. >>> >>> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Hadrian >>> >>> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp >>> >>> >>> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote: >>> >>> Hello Hadrian! >>>> >>>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since >>>> >>>>> then >>>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention >>>>> is >>>>> to >>>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low >>>>> hanging >>>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. >>>>> >>>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as well, >>>>> so >>>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere between >>>>> 80 >>>>> and 100. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Hadrian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to >>>>>> 2.9.1 >>>>>> as >>>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding >>>>>> the >>>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x >>>>>> release >>>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? >>>>>> >>>>>> Babak >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.****** >>>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-******Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html< >>>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabbl**e.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**<http://nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**> >>>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<http://camel.465427.n5.** >>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>>> Principal Software Architect >>>>> Talend, Inc >>>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>> Principal Software Architect >>> Talend, Inc >>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >> > -- > Hadrian Zbarcea > Principal Software Architect > Talend, Inc > http://coders.talend.com/ > http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ > |
|
I fixed this for Camel 2.10.0. The fix is to late to go into Camel 2.9.1
because we should test it also with other JMS providers first. I have no other issues which have to go into Camel 2.9.1. Best, Christian On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Christian Müller < [hidden email]> wrote: > If it's considered as bug or improvement, I would like to fix [1]. It's an > issue we hit last week in our development team and have to use a ugly > workaround... > > [1] > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DefaultUnitOfWork-doesn-t-copy-headers-from-the-original-message-if-it-s-a-JmsMessage-td5518546.html > > Best, > Christian > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[hidden email]>wrote: > >> Thank Chris, looking into it. >> Hadrian >> >> >> On 02/27/2012 09:56 AM, chris snow wrote: >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-5030<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030>would be good :) >>> >>> Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be considered a >>> fix >>> as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its >>> lack >>> of proxy support. >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we >>>> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok >>>> last >>>> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one >>>> failure >>>> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway. >>>> >>>> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Hadrian >>>> >>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Hadrian! >>>>> >>>>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since >>>>> >>>>>> then >>>>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention >>>>>> is >>>>>> to >>>>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low >>>>>> hanging >>>>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. >>>>>> >>>>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as >>>>>> well, so >>>>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere >>>>>> between 80 >>>>>> and 100. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to >>>>>>> 2.9.1 >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x >>>>>>> release >>>>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Babak >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.****** >>>>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-******Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html< >>>>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabbl**e.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**<http://nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**> >>>>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<http://camel.465427.n5.** >>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>>>> Principal Software Architect >>>>>> Talend, Inc >>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>> Principal Software Architect >>>> Talend, Inc >>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Hadrian Zbarcea >> Principal Software Architect >> Talend, Inc >> http://coders.talend.com/ >> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >> > > |
|
First attempt to release camel-2.9.1 failed with an osgi related
problem. Will look into it in the morning and restart the builds. Hadrian On 02/28/2012 06:39 PM, Christian Müller wrote: > I fixed this for Camel 2.10.0. The fix is to late to go into Camel 2.9.1 > because we should test it also with other JMS providers first. > I have no other issues which have to go into Camel 2.9.1. > > Best, > Christian > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Christian Müller< > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> If it's considered as bug or improvement, I would like to fix [1]. It's an >> issue we hit last week in our development team and have to use a ugly >> workaround... >> >> [1] >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DefaultUnitOfWork-doesn-t-copy-headers-from-the-original-message-if-it-s-a-JmsMessage-td5518546.html >> >> Best, >> Christian >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]>wrote: >> >>> Thank Chris, looking into it. >>> Hadrian >>> >>> >>> On 02/27/2012 09:56 AM, chris snow wrote: >>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-5030<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030>would be good :) >>>> >>>> Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be considered a >>>> fix >>>> as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its >>>> lack >>>> of proxy support. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we >>>>> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok >>>>> last >>>>> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one >>>>> failure >>>>> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway. >>>>> >>>>> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Hadrian >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Hadrian! >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Christian >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since >>>>>> >>>>>>> then >>>>>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low >>>>>>> hanging >>>>>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as >>>>>>> well, so >>>>>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere >>>>>>> between 80 >>>>>>> and 100. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to >>>>>>>> 2.9.1 >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Babak >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.****** >>>>>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-******Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html< >>>>>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabbl**e.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**<http://nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**> >>>>>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<http://camel.465427.n5.** >>>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>>>>> Principal Software Architect >>>>>>> Talend, Inc >>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>>> Principal Software Architect >>>>> Talend, Inc >>>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>> Principal Software Architect >>> Talend, Inc >>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> > -- Hadrian Zbarcea Principal Software Architect Talend, Inc http://coders.talend.com/ http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ |
|
Hi Hadrian,
I will take a look also. Regards JB On 03/01/2012 05:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > First attempt to release camel-2.9.1 failed with an osgi related > problem. Will look into it in the morning and restart the builds. > > Hadrian > > On 02/28/2012 06:39 PM, Christian Müller wrote: >> I fixed this for Camel 2.10.0. The fix is to late to go into Camel 2.9.1 >> because we should test it also with other JMS providers first. >> I have no other issues which have to go into Camel 2.9.1. >> >> Best, >> Christian >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Christian Müller< >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> If it's considered as bug or improvement, I would like to fix [1]. >>> It's an >>> issue we hit last week in our development team and have to use a ugly >>> workaround... >>> >>> [1] >>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DefaultUnitOfWork-doesn-t-copy-headers-from-the-original-message-if-it-s-a-JmsMessage-td5518546.html >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Hadrian >>> Zbarcea<[hidden email]>wrote: >>> >>>> Thank Chris, looking into it. >>>> Hadrian >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/27/2012 09:56 AM, chris snow wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-5030<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030>would >>>>> be good :) >>>>> >>>>> Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be >>>>> considered a >>>>> fix >>>>> as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its >>>>> lack >>>>> of proxy support. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small >>>>> fixes we >>>>>> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds >>>>>> were ok >>>>>> last >>>>>> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one >>>>>> failure >>>>>> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Hadrian! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[hidden email]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. >>>>>>> Since >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My >>>>>>>> intention >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low >>>>>>>> hanging >>>>>>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper >>>>>>>> uris. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as >>>>>>>> well, so >>>>>>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere >>>>>>>> between 80 >>>>>>>> and 100. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to >>>>>>>>> 2.9.1 >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly >>>>>>>>> regarding >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x >>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target >>>>>>>>> release? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Babak >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.****** >>>>>>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-******Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html< >>>>>>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabbl**e.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**<http://nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<http://camel.465427.n5.** >>>>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at >>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect >>>>>>>> Talend, Inc >>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>>>> Principal Software Architect >>>>>> Talend, Inc >>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hadrian Zbarcea >>>> Principal Software Architect >>>> Talend, Inc >>>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [hidden email] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
